Joined: Mon Sep 05, 2005 1:01 am Posts: 188 Location: Tomahawk Has thanked: 0 time Been thanked: 0 time
Tie to Tomahawk: born in Tomahawk - family
is it really a good idea to lighten up for first time offenders? Actually the mojority of "first time offenders" are just first time "caught" offenders....
Panel Recommends Lighter Crack Sentences
WASHINGTON, April 28, 2007 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- (AP) A first-time crack-cocaine conviction should mean a lower federal minimum sentence than under current guidelines, according to a judicial agency that has raised concerns about a disparity in punishment for people caught with crack or powder cocaine.
The U.S. Sentencing Commission voted to lower the recommended sentencing range for those caught with 5 grams or more of crack cocaine from 63 months to 78 months to a range of 51 months to 63 months. Those with at least 50 grams should serve 97 months to 121 months in prison, not 121 months to 151 months, as the guidelines now say, the commission said late Friday.
At issue is a 1986 law that includes what critics have called the 100-to-1 disparity: Trafficking in 5 grams of crack cocaine carries a mandatory five-year prison sentence, but it takes 500 grams of cocaine powder to warrant the same sentence.
This is the fourth time the commission, an independent agency in the judicial branch, has recommended that Congress narrow the sentencing gap. Previous recommendations, which were not adopted, have included raising the penalties for powder cocaine and lowering them for crack.
The commission's guidelines are designed to ensure that federal sentences do not vary widely from courtroom to courtroom. They were mandatory until 2005. That year, the Supreme Court said making the guidelines mandatory violated a defendant's Sixth Amendment right to a jury trial because they call for judges to make factual decisions that could add to prison time, such as the amount of drugs involved in a crime.
The commission planned to send its recommendation to Congress before May 1. Lawmakers would have until Nov. 1 to reject the new guidelines before they would become law.
Advocates for changing the law point to crime statistics that show crack is more of an urban and minority drug while cocaine powder is used more often by the affluent, and that harsher penalties for crack cocaine unfairly punish blacks.
“This unjust policy is based on little more than politics and urban myths, yet it's been allowed to stand for over 20 years, devastating African-American communities in the process,” said Caroline Fredrickson, director of the ACLU's legislative office in Washington.
In November, U.S. District Judge Reggie B. Walton told the agency that federal laws requiring dramatically longer sentences for crack cocaine than for cocaine powder were “unconscionable” and contributed to the perception within minority communities that courts are unfair.
While Congress would have to overturn the 1986 law to erase minimum sentences, the commission's new rule “provides some relief to crack cocaine offenders impacted by the disparity created by federal cocaine sentencing policy,” the commission said in a statement.
But the Justice Department has urged the commission to let Congress deal with the inconsistency. “While we are willing to discuss addressing the disparity in the ratio between crack and powder cocaine, we believe that it should be done in the broader context of sentencing reform,” spokesman Brian Roehrkasse said.
House Judiciary Committee Chairman Rep. John Conyers, D-Mich., a longtime advocate of equalizing penalties for crack and powder cocaine, has said he will hold hearings to address the issue.
Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2001 1:01 am Posts: 225 Location: Tomahawk, WI Has thanked:1 time Been thanked: 0 time
Tie to Tomahawk: Resident 1980 - 1989, retired here 5/2012
Originally posted by logic1: is it really a good idea to lighten up for first time offenders? Actually the majority of "first time offenders" are just first time "caught" offenders....
I wouldn't be in favor of lightening the sentence. Like you said 1st time offender really just means first time caught. Given that crack users will do anything to get more crack they are a danger to the rest of society. I worked with a crack addict, she was a mess and she'd rob her own family members to get money for crack.
More women die of lung cancer than breast cancer. If you smoke, quit. If you don't, don't start.
Joined: Fri Feb 27, 2004 2:01 am Posts: 279 Location: Mountain View, CA Has thanked:21 times Been thanked:4 times
Tie to Tomahawk: Grew up in Tomahawk in the 50s and early 60s, left after High School in '64
The people that are getting caught and arrested with 5 grams of crack or cocaine are dealers...as opposed to users. As such they should get the longest sentence possible. I have no sympathy for dealers.
Users (non dealing users), on the other hand, 'may' have some rehabilitation value. Many are caught up in the insidiousness of using drugs and/or alcohol and, with help, might break out of their craziness and become fine upstanding, tax paying, perch fishing, citizens. I speak from experience...except I haven't fished for years....
Again.....Dealers - no break, jail 'em all. Users - maybe there's something worth saving.
This is the simple version of the argument, I know, and this subject isn't quite this simple. But I hope you see my point.
_________________ Ken Martell firstname.lastname@example.org Thankful to be alive and healthy. Proud to call Tomahawk my hometown.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum