Isn't it ironic:

Forum for General Topics not covered by other areas.
Larry Tobin
Occasional Poster
Occasional Poster
Posts: 23
Joined: Mon Jan 30, 2012 4:54 pm
Tie to Tomahawk: home - business owner

Isn't it ironic:

Postby Larry Tobin » Wed Feb 29, 2012 4:12 pm

I've had this pointed out by a number of people and thought I'd pass it on: Isn't it ironic that the food stamp program, part of the Dept. of Agriculture, is pleased to be distributing the greatest amount of food stamps ever. Meanwhile, the Park Service, also part of the Dept. of Agriculture, asks us to "Please don't feed the animals" because they may grow dependent and not learn to take care of themselves.

User avatar
Nimble
Contributor
Contributor
Posts: 184
Joined: Tue Sep 25, 2001 1:01 am
Tie to Tomahawk: Work

Re: Isn't it ironic:

Postby Nimble » Sat Mar 03, 2012 10:16 pm

Larry Tobin wrote:I've had this pointed out by a number of people and thought I'd pass it on: Isn't it ironic that the food stamp program, part of the Dept. of Agriculture, is pleased to be distributing the greatest amount of food stamps ever. Meanwhile, the Park Service, also part of the Dept. of Agriculture, asks us to "Please don't feed the animals" because they may grow dependent and not learn to take care of themselves.


The U.S. Park Service is part of the Department of the Interior. Perhaps you are thinking of the U.S. Forest Service which is part of the Department of Agriculture. Both beside the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Bureau of Land Management and numerous state and local agencies advise people not to feed certain animals. The reason ultimately is danger to humans and interruption in nature's management of the natural world . The feeding is a process that may lead to problems. Numerically we add 3 million people to the US population each year (and they are not all immigrants) so it is no surprise that we have more people on food stamps, more people driving cars, more people needing medical care and more people demanding infrastructure. But, maybe the nation is getting better; we have fewer people reading what used to be called Newspapers.

User avatar
Kerry Tobin
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 691
Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2001 1:01 am
Tie to Tomahawk: I grew up there & family
Location: Madison, WI, USA

Re: Isn't it ironic:

Postby Kerry Tobin » Mon Mar 05, 2012 11:14 pm

Nimble,

But, maybe the nation is getting better; we have fewer people reading what used to be called Newspapers.


Yes, because the Internet, a place where anyone and everyone can post what ever ridiculous B.S. they want and convince others it's legitimate news and reporting, is SO much better...

User avatar
Nimble
Contributor
Contributor
Posts: 184
Joined: Tue Sep 25, 2001 1:01 am
Tie to Tomahawk: Work

Re: Isn't it ironic:

Postby Nimble » Tue Mar 06, 2012 2:29 pm

If you can find an error of fact in my post, please feel free to point it out.
"Know ye not why We created you all from the same dust? That no one should exalt himself over the other." -Baha'u'llah

River Rat
Typical Poster
Typical Poster
Posts: 75
Joined: Tue Sep 14, 2010 3:17 pm
Tie to Tomahawk: my cottage and hunting camp

Re: Isn't it ironic:

Postby River Rat » Wed Mar 07, 2012 11:01 am

Nimble wrote: The reason ultimately is danger to humans and interruption in nature's management of the natural world .


Your wrong. Your statment is only true if two assumptions are made. 1) That Human's are not a part of nature; and 2) aminals, other than and in the absence of humans, can actively mangage their own "world."

Both of these assumptions are clearly false. Statements like this arise from the proliferation of things like Disney movies where animals can talk and dance to music misteriously playing in the woods.

User avatar
Nimble
Contributor
Contributor
Posts: 184
Joined: Tue Sep 25, 2001 1:01 am
Tie to Tomahawk: Work

Re: Isn't it ironic:

Postby Nimble » Thu Mar 08, 2012 8:31 pm

River Rat wrote:
Nimble wrote: The reason ultimately is danger to humans and interruption in nature's management of the natural world .


Your wrong. Your statment is only true if two assumptions are made. 1) That Human's are not a part of nature; and 2) aminals, other than and in the absence of humans, can actively mangage their own "world."

Both of these assumptions are clearly false. Statements like this arise from the proliferation of things like Disney movies where animals can talk and dance to music misteriously playing in the woods.


You make it clear why I am correct. We cannot separate ourselves from nature, that is my point. We cannot kill off other species and pretend that we are god and will fill in to manage the void. And of course as is proven by the hundreds of millions of years prior to humans coming on the scene, nature can in fact manage itself.

River Rat
Typical Poster
Typical Poster
Posts: 75
Joined: Tue Sep 14, 2010 3:17 pm
Tie to Tomahawk: my cottage and hunting camp

Re: Isn't it ironic:

Postby River Rat » Fri Mar 09, 2012 10:31 am

Nimble: We cannot separate ourselves from nature, that is my point


I would also confirm that the loss of a species is an undesirable outcome. However, your contention that no species became extinct by predation porior to humans evolving is preposterous. Animals killed animals. "Nature" killed-off untold numbers of species. Evolution filled the voids left with more adaptable and better suited creatures. What we have today is a vast fauna, huge biodiversity, because of this process. "Nautre" kills animals, and as you said we humans are nature. Therefore It is "nature" (natural) for humans to hunt. I'm glad to know by your words that you support hunting and its sustainable harvest for food and clothing.


Return to “General Discussion”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

cron