Arnold for President

Forum for General Topics not covered by other areas.
nugget
Contributor
Contributor
Posts: 157
Joined: Wed Aug 28, 2002 1:01 am
Location: Tomahawk

Re: closed topics/barstool biology

Postby nugget » Thu Dec 22, 2005 5:50 am

Yes, I followed it and read it. I actually had some thoughts to share and could not so I asked why. I also find it inteeresting that you would first assume that I did not. C J, I have had wolves in my area for over 15 years. I have lots of wildlife. Wolves do have fear, if it was non-exsistant then why do they flee when they hear me coming thru the woods? People fear them. Unless of course they have a gun and are safe in a tree stand. Becoming a link in the food chain is very frightening for humans. As we are supposedly top on the food chain. Wolves think, feel, fear, love, morn, hunger, have all the feelings others have. I do not fear them or hate them, I respect them and their place in this world. They are welcome to my land and the help in cleaning up the dear that are hurt and slowly dieing or dead after the hunt is apperciated.I find at least 10 or more deer that have been hurt,shot, and are slowly dieing after the hunt each year. Mostly young small ones. They also help clean up all the carcuses that the hunters throw along the back trail after they clean the ones they keep. It would be nice if they did not throw the plastic bag on my land also. I just end up having to pick up all that plastic. Yep those people respect the land and what it has to offer :roll: Maybe we should think about controlling the human population. Humans as a species for the most part destroy, contaminate, desimate, and waste. Some do not but most do. "Money changes everything"
Spay or nueter your pets!!!!!!!

Tomahawk Leader
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 661
Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2001 1:01 am
Contact:

Re: closed topics/barstool biology

Postby Tomahawk Leader » Thu Dec 22, 2005 7:44 am

This still is not the topic to discuss wolves...

Please move the discussion back to the topics about wolves...

nugget
Contributor
Contributor
Posts: 157
Joined: Wed Aug 28, 2002 1:01 am
Location: Tomahawk

Re: closed topics/barstool biology

Postby nugget » Thu Dec 22, 2005 8:48 am

Can you tell me which other posts have been locked out. I went back a year and see no other locks on the threads. I am more then likely just missing them, as you all are so much more informed then I.
Spay or nueter your pets!!!!!!!

Jeff Boettcher
Regular Contributor
Regular Contributor
Posts: 692
Joined: Sun Nov 25, 2001 2:01 am
Tie to Tomahawk: vacation

Re: closed topics/barstool biology

Postby Jeff Boettcher » Thu Dec 22, 2005 10:36 pm

I've been gone for awhile. So where is that wolf strand that Nugget is talking about??

The only "lock Out" I've heard of was Kottah after he executed some on-line gymnastics that offended.
What if there were no hypothetical questions?

Tomahawk Leader
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 661
Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2001 1:01 am
Contact:

Re: closed topics/barstool biology

Postby Tomahawk Leader » Fri Dec 23, 2005 7:49 am

As far as other closed threads there haven't been too many (a sign that we really don't close many from my perspective). We also haven't had that many times where we have had multiple discussions occurring at the same time on the same topic.

In addition, the In Our Opinion and Letters to the Editor postings are something new. This is the first time since we started posting those that we have had a column (which belongs in the In Our Opinion area) respond to a Letter to the Editor (which belongs in the Letters to the Editor area). It could have been even more confusing to follow if the original column that lead to the letter had been posted. That column would also be closed now because the Letter to the Editor would have been important to the discussion and would be where all new posts on the topic should have been.

Jeff, there has only been one person who has been permanently banned. We have closed topics before. We also have edited a few posts (language, attacks, etc.). We haven't closed topics just because we don't like them (even ones directly attacking our products).

The closed thread can be found at: 1st Thread

The followup can be found at: 2nd Thread

We are just trying to keep the discussions organized and make sure everyone has seen all of the discussion on the topic before they reply.

Deb Richardson
Regular Contributor
Regular Contributor
Posts: 794
Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2001 1:01 am
Tie to Tomahawk: Called it home for many years.
Location: Sadly not Tomahawk

Arnold for President

Postby Deb Richardson » Sun Jan 07, 2007 2:12 pm

It seems that Gov. Arnold of California has put on quite the Hollywood extravaganza for his second inaugruation. Which some may look at as living the American dream, considering his imigrant status. At the time of his re-election a CNN piece touched on changing the Constitution to allow someone that is not a natural born citizen to run for president. Is this country ready to move in that direction, after all American is considered a melting pot of nationalities. Any thoughts?
Life is too short for drama & petty things!
So, laugh insanely, love truly and forgive quickly!

User avatar
Brian
Contributor
Contributor
Posts: 170
Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2001 1:01 am
Tie to Tomahawk: Fourth generation native.
Location: Hatchet Creek, Wisconsin

Re: Arnold for President

Postby Brian » Sun Jan 07, 2007 4:24 pm

Short and sweet - leave the Constitution alone. We've got enough natural-born American nitwits who have held/are holding/wish to hold that office without opening it up to foreigners.
When you wish upon a falling star, your dreams can come true. Unless it's really a meteorite hurtling to the Earth which will destroy all life. Then you're pretty much hosed no matter what you wish for. Unless it's death by meteor.

KEN
Contributor
Contributor
Posts: 368
Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2001 1:01 am

Re: Arnold for President

Postby KEN » Sun Jan 07, 2007 6:02 pm

I`ll put it this way ,
If we were to change the Constitution to allow a foreign born to become President...........Arnold is not the guy to do it for. ;)

<small>[ January 07, 2007, 05:03 PM: Message edited by: KEN ]</small>

Merse
General User
General User
Posts: 40
Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2001 1:01 am
Location: Tomahawk

Re: Arnold for President

Postby Merse » Tue Jan 09, 2007 6:13 pm

Silly me....I'm sitting here dumbfounded that Arnold actually has a 2nd Inaugaration! :p

Anyhow....another vote to NOT change the Constitution!!

'Nuff said.

Peace

jimmo
General User
General User
Posts: 40
Joined: Thu Sep 08, 2005 1:01 am
Location: Tomahawk

Re: Arnold for President

Postby jimmo » Wed Jan 17, 2007 6:16 pm

And if it would allow nonnatural borns to run for Pres. would illegals be next?

jimmo
General User
General User
Posts: 40
Joined: Thu Sep 08, 2005 1:01 am
Location: Tomahawk

Re: Arnold for President

Postby jimmo » Wed Jan 17, 2007 6:16 pm

And if it would allow nonnatural borns to run for Pres. would illegals be next?

jimmo
General User
General User
Posts: 40
Joined: Thu Sep 08, 2005 1:01 am
Location: Tomahawk

Re: Arnold for President

Postby jimmo » Wed Jan 17, 2007 6:16 pm

And if it would allow nonnatural borns to run for Pres. would illegals be next?

jimmo
General User
General User
Posts: 40
Joined: Thu Sep 08, 2005 1:01 am
Location: Tomahawk

Re: Arnold for President

Postby jimmo » Wed Jan 17, 2007 6:16 pm

And if it would allow nonnatural borns to run for Pres. would illegals be next?

jimmo
General User
General User
Posts: 40
Joined: Thu Sep 08, 2005 1:01 am
Location: Tomahawk

Re: Arnold for President

Postby jimmo » Wed Jan 17, 2007 6:16 pm

And if it would allow nonnatural borns to run for Pres. would illegals be next?

Haley

Re: Arnold for President

Postby Haley » Sat Jan 20, 2007 11:47 am

There's a big difference between legal, naturalized Americans and "illegals".

Haley

Re: Arnold for President

Postby Haley » Sat Jan 20, 2007 11:47 am

There's a big difference between legal, naturalized Americans and "illegals".

Haley

Re: Arnold for President

Postby Haley » Sat Jan 20, 2007 11:47 am

There's a big difference between legal, naturalized Americans and "illegals".

Haley

Re: Arnold for President

Postby Haley » Sat Jan 20, 2007 11:47 am

There's a big difference between legal, naturalized Americans and "illegals".

Haley

Re: Arnold for President

Postby Haley » Sat Jan 20, 2007 11:47 am

There's a big difference between legal, naturalized Americans and "illegals".

User avatar
Old Scout
Regular Contributor
Regular Contributor
Posts: 842
Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2001 1:01 am
Tie to Tomahawk: Born, raised and live in Tomahawk
Location: Tomahawk

Re: Arnold for President

Postby Old Scout » Sun Jan 21, 2007 1:21 pm

There's a big difference between legal, naturalized Americans and "illegals".

There sure is, in a lot of cases the the Illegals have more rights and benifits ! :mad:
The National Institutes of Health has just released the results of a $200 million research study completed under a grant to Johns Hopkins.
The new study has found that women who carry a little extra weight live longer than the men who mention it.

User avatar
Old Scout
Regular Contributor
Regular Contributor
Posts: 842
Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2001 1:01 am
Tie to Tomahawk: Born, raised and live in Tomahawk
Location: Tomahawk

Re: Arnold for President

Postby Old Scout » Sun Jan 21, 2007 1:21 pm

There's a big difference between legal, naturalized Americans and "illegals".

There sure is, in a lot of cases the the Illegals have more rights and benifits ! :mad:
The National Institutes of Health has just released the results of a $200 million research study completed under a grant to Johns Hopkins.
The new study has found that women who carry a little extra weight live longer than the men who mention it.

User avatar
Old Scout
Regular Contributor
Regular Contributor
Posts: 842
Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2001 1:01 am
Tie to Tomahawk: Born, raised and live in Tomahawk
Location: Tomahawk

Re: Arnold for President

Postby Old Scout » Sun Jan 21, 2007 1:21 pm

There's a big difference between legal, naturalized Americans and "illegals".

There sure is, in a lot of cases the the Illegals have more rights and benifits ! :mad:
The National Institutes of Health has just released the results of a $200 million research study completed under a grant to Johns Hopkins.
The new study has found that women who carry a little extra weight live longer than the men who mention it.

User avatar
Old Scout
Regular Contributor
Regular Contributor
Posts: 842
Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2001 1:01 am
Tie to Tomahawk: Born, raised and live in Tomahawk
Location: Tomahawk

Re: Arnold for President

Postby Old Scout » Sun Jan 21, 2007 1:21 pm

There's a big difference between legal, naturalized Americans and "illegals".

There sure is, in a lot of cases the the Illegals have more rights and benifits ! :mad:
The National Institutes of Health has just released the results of a $200 million research study completed under a grant to Johns Hopkins.
The new study has found that women who carry a little extra weight live longer than the men who mention it.

User avatar
Old Scout
Regular Contributor
Regular Contributor
Posts: 842
Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2001 1:01 am
Tie to Tomahawk: Born, raised and live in Tomahawk
Location: Tomahawk

Re: Arnold for President

Postby Old Scout » Sun Jan 21, 2007 1:21 pm

There's a big difference between legal, naturalized Americans and "illegals".

There sure is, in a lot of cases the the Illegals have more rights and benifits ! :mad:
The National Institutes of Health has just released the results of a $200 million research study completed under a grant to Johns Hopkins.
The new study has found that women who carry a little extra weight live longer than the men who mention it.

healthy1
Beginner
Beginner
Posts: 7
Joined: Wed Jan 31, 2007 2:01 am
Location: merrill

Re: Arnold for President

Postby healthy1 » Tue Feb 06, 2007 3:12 pm

Leave the constitution alone until, they have clean -up the Lobby/ election. As it is the Highest bidder get more say.


Return to “General Discussion”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests