Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2001 1:01 am Posts: 110 Location: Tomahawk WI Has thanked: 0 time Been thanked: 0 time
Tie to Tomahawk: The Tomahawk Leader
When the call came in to the Leader office with that suggestion last week it was like, well, duh…why didn't we think of that? Or, more appropriately, why didn't the Department of Natural Resources think of it? Okay, so they did…sort of. But we don't think their response was adequate.<p> The discovery of Chronic Wasting Disease (CWD) in fewer than 20 deer in a small portion of southern Wisconsin in recent months has caused an uproar of epic proportions throughout the state. Whether or not the uproar is warranted, we're uncertain. We've heard conflicting views from Colorado, where the disease was first discovered several years ago. One side says that, if they had addressed the issue as aggressively as Wisconsin is attempting to, it wouldn't be east of the Mississippi River today. The other side claims it's not that big a deal in Colorado and wonders why we're raising such a fuss.<p> The DNR wants to kill all the deer in the portion of the state where the infected deer have been found, and to test all the deer that hunters kill in a sizeable area of the southern part of the state. Limitations on labs available will keep deer from being tested in the rest of Wisconsin, leaving many hunters concerned over whether the deer they kill will be safe to consume. Also, a recent poll indicates that, because of the discovery of CWD, as many as 36% of deer hunters may not participate this year. That will only further add to the problems. The deer harvest will be reduced, fewer deer will be tested, and pocketbooks will be affected throughout the state.<p> But there is a way that the DNR can test deer statewide, all year long, and it won't stress testing labs like it will when the flood of animals comes in during hunting seasons. Simply use some of the federal money that has been allocated to fight the disease to work with the State Department of Transportation to pick up car-killed deer and have them tested. Our highways provide a ready supply of test animals that will be there, regardless of hunting seasons. Removing them for test purposes would also clean up an unsightly problem along our roadsides that developed when the state stopped removing car-killed deer several years ago.<p> The DNR, however, says that deer need to be "fresh" in order to do proper testing. That's difficult, especially during the summer. A problem, perhaps, but not insurmountable. Most insurance companies require notification of proper law enforcement authorities for deer/car crash claims. Requiring immediate notification is not that difficult and we believe most motorists and law enforcement agencies would be cooperative. Many, if not most, road kills could be picked up in a timely fashion. It's certainly better than sitting on our hands and waiting for the fall hunting season.<p> Certainly, it's not the only step necessary in fighting CWD. But it does seem like such an obvious effort that does not rely on universal support from a million or so hunters. And the results of findings on animals tested all year long, throughout the state, could be invaluable in determining steps necessary during the hunting season to keep our herd healthy, along with our hunting traditions.
Joined: Tue Aug 21, 2001 1:01 am Posts: 17 Location: Tomahawk Has thanked: 0 time Been thanked: 0 time
It would be a great idea for them to test the road kill deer! Maybe at least then they would get picked up from along the highways.We just came back from Merrill along HWY 51 alot of deer kills and do they stink!! I know it costs alot of money to pick them up but come on somethings really do need to be done! I cant stand seeing them all big and parts laying all over,the smell is unreal thank goodness I dont have a convertable!
Joined: Wed Apr 03, 2002 2:01 am Posts: 2 Has thanked: 0 time Been thanked: 0 time
Using car-kill deer would be a perfect solution to the testing problem. It would save killing off deer just for testing and also rid the roadways of the dead carcasses...As for the space needed for testing, don't they just need the deer head? I'm sure with alittle thought, the rest of the deer could be discarded with minimum cost....
Joined: Fri Oct 05, 2001 1:01 am Posts: 46 Location: Mt. Olympus Has thanked: 0 time Been thanked: 0 time
Testing road kill was discussed by the people doing the testing. They said it is possible in some cases. There is the problem for example of transporting a deer carcass to the tester or vice versa whereas they are set up to test in areas of the controlled kill. The other problem cited was that many road kill deer were unusable for the test due to their condition (something about it being hard to test a big gooey spot on the pavement).
Joined: Fri Aug 31, 2001 1:01 am Posts: 112 Has thanked: 0 time Been thanked: 0 time
Apparently if they have someone who is experienced in extracting what they need, they can extract it from the appropriate portion of the brain, but it needs to be done within an hour at the most. This would leave the possiblity of testing road kill to a minimum.
_________________ If all the atheists left the United States it would lose 93% of the National Academy of Sciences but less than 1% of the prison population.
Users browsing this forum: TurnitinBot [Bot] and 2 guests
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum