Nimble wrote:How exactly is smoking related to private property? Some of the businesses making this claim lease or rent their location and overlooking that the impact of the smoking impacts all in the form of impaired health potential and if we ignore that there is is still the increases we all pay in increased insurance and health care costs. No rights are absolute. When your right begans to negatively impact another, then you have reached the point where your right is no longer absolute. If you are on rented property, private property, or public property when this happens makes no difference.
Jeff Boettcher wrote:Aphephilia:
The Tavern league's objections make no sense. If the ban is statewide, then there is a level playing ground for all. Especially if surrounding states have already made the move to smoke-free.
Kerry Tobin wrote:When it comes to health related issues and safety issues its normal for a business to be regulated guys... And it is done for both the consumer and employee's safety.
You can't use asbestos
Must have clean running water to serve food
Must meet electrical standards
Must meet fire codes
Must meet numerous food related codes
Employees must wash hands before leaving bathroom
Must follow OSHA safety requirements
Must meet handicap accessibility requirements in a remodel
Must have operating licenses
I'm sure we can find a ton more...
Consumers could have chosen to visit businesses that label there exits, etc. For everyone's good, we simply require it by law... How is smoking really any different?
Users browsing this forum: Yahoo [Bot] and 2 guests